Across professional landscapes, there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that challenge the very notion of accountability . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia once recognized as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of questionable workplace conduct that casts a shadow over professional credibility but throws doubt over the enterprise’s integrity .


Even despite the disturbing claims , Collins has remained in his managerial role, apparently unscathed by the turmoil surrounding him. How has this been allowed to persist? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to insider reports , Collins’ track record of misconduct started with breaches of internal policies , but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it evolved into repeated infractions that has left colleagues disillusioned and partners bewildered .


Amid a leadership training workshop — ostensibly intended to foster professional growth — David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a development chance into a spree of inappropriate episodes . It’s reported he spent business-funded trips attempting to seduce female colleagues , accessed inappropriate content , a clear breach of Ventia’s corporate guidelines, all while his home life was kept in the dark.


But the ethical breaches went further than just personal misconduct. One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged misuse of corporate technology to distribute inappropriate content —a gross misappropriation of professional tools . His audacious misuse of workplace messaging platforms to engage in suggestive conversations —including Kerikeri David Collins emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — reveals an attitude of impunity. Following these online indiscretions , Collins allegedly escalated his transgressions : he is said to have pursued a workplace affair in defiance of company policies, despite both parties being in relationships . This flagrant misuse of work hours and corporate assets shattered the boundaries of ethical conduct but also caused irreparable personal damage beyond the workplace .

How has this level of misconduct remained unchecked? How does such behavior continue without repercussions? The explanation, it appears, originates in a problematic dearth of accountability within the company . Complaints have been raised, but no disciplinary action has followed.

This lack of oversight conveys a risky precedent : that power within the organization shields wrongdoers . It breeds a damaging work setting , discourages ethical behavior , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .